nanog mailing list archives
Re: /31 mask address
From: "Miguel Mata-Cardona" <mmata () sv intercomnet net>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 16:30:27 -0500
hmmm, as long as you allow directed broadcast on the interfaces... it should work... On 3 May 2002 at 16:24, Toan Do wrote:
Has anyone used /31 mask addresses on their network? Toan
-- Miguel Mata-Cardona Intercom El Salvador mmata () sv intercomnet net
Current thread:
- Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks?, (continued)
- Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 03)
- /31 mask address Toan Do (May 03)
- Re: /31 mask address Simon Lockhart (May 03)
- Re: /31 mask address Andre Chapuis (May 03)
- Re: /31 mask address Simon Lockhart (May 03)
- Re: /31 mask address Robert E. Seastrom (May 03)
- Re: /31 mask address Manolo Hernandez (May 03)
- Re: /31 mask address Andre Chapuis (May 03)
- Re: /31 mask address JAKO Andras (May 06)
- Re: /31 mask address Simon Lockhart (May 06)
- Re: /31 mask address Miguel Mata-Cardona (May 03)
- Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Stephen Griffin (May 04)
- Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Christopher L. Morrow (May 04)
- Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 05)
- RE: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Barry Raveendran Greene (May 05)
- unicast RPF for peers viable? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 05)
- Re: unicast RPF for peers viable? Richard A Steenbergen (May 05)
- RE: unicast RPF for peers viable? Barry Raveendran Greene (May 05)
- uRPF Loose Check Mode vs. ACL Livio Ricciulli (May 05)
- Re: uRPF Loose Check Mode vs. ACL Richard A Steenbergen (May 05)
- Re: uRPF Loose Check Mode vs. ACL Livio Ricciulli (May 05)