nanog mailing list archives
RE: Large ISPs doing NAT?
From: "Deepak Jain" <deepak () ai net>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 17:01:28 -0400
Almost? I'd say it's hands down an EXCELLENT reason. In some configs though, the NAT'd people can still see each other and cause problems, but it still cuts down the exposure. ---- Presumably, the people it would cause problems for would be the customers of someone getting paid to care about them. :) Deepak Jain AiNET
Current thread:
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?, (continued)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Dan Hollis (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Avleen Vig (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Steven J. Sobol (May 04)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? mike harrison (May 01)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Deepak Jain (May 01)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? kevin graham (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? John Kristoff (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Jake Khuon (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 02)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Peter Bierman (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Jake Khuon (May 02)
- Re[2]: Large ISPs doing NAT? Richard Welty (May 02)