nanog mailing list archives
Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?
From: John Kristoff <jtk () depaul edu>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 17:34:22 -0500
On Wed, 1 May 2002 11:00:01 -0400 (EDT) mike harrison <meuon () highertech net> wrote:
Almost? I'd say it's hands down an EXCELLENT reason. In some configs though, the NAT'd people can still see each other and cause problems, but it still cuts down the exposure.
As well as perpetuates the neglect for fixing the real problem. John
Current thread:
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?, (continued)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Avleen Vig (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Steven J. Sobol (May 04)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? mike harrison (May 01)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Deepak Jain (May 01)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? kevin graham (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? John Kristoff (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Jake Khuon (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 02)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Peter Bierman (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Jake Khuon (May 02)
- Re[2]: Large ISPs doing NAT? Richard Welty (May 02)