nanog mailing list archives
RE: Wired: Congress to Enter ICANN Fray
From: "Larry Diffey" <ldiffey () technologyforward com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:20:55 -0800
When did the Internet become CENTRAL to national security???? Mildly important? Sure. Central? No way! I think Senator Burns is mistaking national security for political security therefore he must DO SOMETHING about the problems at ICANN. Senator Burns, put down the microphone and back away from the cameras! <snip>
"More fundamental questions also need to be addressed, such as whether
ICANN
is even the most appropriate organization to be tasked with such a
critical
mission, which is central to our national security," wrote Sen. Conrad
Burns
(R-Montana) in a letter asking for hearings. < snip > http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,51041,00.html
Current thread:
- CEOlink Sean Donelan (Mar 13)
- Re: CEOlink Robert A. Hayden (Mar 13)
- Re: CEOlink William Allen Simpson (Mar 13)
- Re: CEOlink Joel Baker (Mar 13)
- Re: CEOlink Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 13)
- Re: CEOlink Jeffrey Meltzer (Mar 13)
- Re: CEOlink Susan Harris (Mar 14)
- Re[2]: CEOlink Allan Liska (Mar 14)
- Wired: Congress to Enter ICANN Fray Richard Forno (Mar 14)
- RE: Wired: Congress to Enter ICANN Fray Larry Diffey (Mar 14)
- Re: Wired: Congress to Enter ICANN Fray Joel Baker (Mar 14)
- RE: Wired: Congress to Enter ICANN Fray Tony Hain (Mar 14)
- Re: Wired: Congress to Enter ICANN Fray Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 15)
- Re: CEOlink Joel Baker (Mar 13)
- Re: Wired: Congress to Enter ICANN Fray Neil J. McRae (Mar 15)
- Re: CEOlink mike harrison (Mar 14)
- Re: CEOlink Sean Donelan (Mar 13)
- Re: CEOlink Jeff Mcadams (Mar 13)
- ipnmoo (Re: CEOlink) k claffy (Mar 14)
- Message not available
- Re: ipnmoo (Re: CEOlink) k claffy (Mar 14)