nanog mailing list archives
Re: CEOlink
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 22:29:01 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Steve Feldman wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 03:55:26PM -0500, William Allen Simpson wrote:Once upon a time, kc had a MOO -- we used to hang out there and discuss things in real time....It's still there, but doesn't see much activity these days. Steve
Yep, IPNMOO is still around, and some people use it. NANOG is the closest thing we have to a "all-hands" channel, but lots of people don't like the signal to noise ratio. I have my nocwire list, but its mostly just interesting things sean saw on the net. Individual engineers use IRC, AIM, etc to communicate with people they know. Its informal, but so far it has served us well.
Current thread:
- Re: CEOlink, (continued)
- Re: CEOlink Susan Harris (Mar 14)
- Re[2]: CEOlink Allan Liska (Mar 14)
- Wired: Congress to Enter ICANN Fray Richard Forno (Mar 14)
- RE: Wired: Congress to Enter ICANN Fray Larry Diffey (Mar 14)
- Re: Wired: Congress to Enter ICANN Fray Joel Baker (Mar 14)
- RE: Wired: Congress to Enter ICANN Fray Tony Hain (Mar 14)
- Re: Wired: Congress to Enter ICANN Fray Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 15)
- Re: Wired: Congress to Enter ICANN Fray Neil J. McRae (Mar 15)
- Re: CEOlink mike harrison (Mar 14)
- Re: CEOlink Sean Donelan (Mar 13)
- Re: CEOlink Jeff Mcadams (Mar 13)
- ipnmoo (Re: CEOlink) k claffy (Mar 14)
- Message not available
- Re: ipnmoo (Re: CEOlink) k claffy (Mar 14)
- Re: CEOlink Eric Brandwine (Mar 13)
- Re: CEOlink Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 14)
- Re: CEOlink mike harrison (Mar 14)
- Re: CEOlink Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 14)
- Re: CEOlink Niels Bakker (Mar 14)