nanog mailing list archives
Re: SPEWS?
From: "Peter Galbavy" <peter.galbavy () knowtion net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:48:36 +0100
But then there are the whacko's like SpamCop who just ignore every mail you send them anyway. i.e. My company set up the RIPE LIR for the UK company 'III' many years ago. I was listed as a contact for a while, then when we stopped providing services I removed my contact from the RIPE records. I am regularly getting SpamCop alerts that I am a spammer - from an obviously out of date copy of the RIPE database (which breaches RIPE copyright anyhow). But will they respond to any e-mail ? Hell no. What makes me laugh more is that SpamAssissin labels SpamCop alerts as spam and they get dumped in my SPAM catch mailbox. Almost cute. Peter
Current thread:
- Re: SPEWS?, (continued)
- Re: SPEWS? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re[2]: SPEWS? Richard Welty (Jun 20)
- Re: Re[2]: SPEWS? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 20)
- Re[2]: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re[3]: SPEWS? Richard Welty (Jun 20)
- Re[3]: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Sandy Harris (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Jim Segrave (Jun 21)
- Re: SPEWS? Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 21)
- Re: SPEWS? Peter Galbavy (Jun 21)
- Re: attention network operators who are listed in blacklists! your problem is with the blockers, not the blacklist managers! (was: SPEWS?) Greg A. Woods (Jun 21)
- Re: attention network operators who are listed in blacklists! your problem is with the blockers, not the blacklist managers! (was: SPEWS?) Peter Galbavy (Jun 22)
- Re: attention network operators who are listed in blacklists! your problem is with the blockers, not the blacklist managers! (was: SPEWS?) Bruce Campbell (Jun 24)
- Re: SPEWS? Måns Nilsson (Jun 21)
- Re: SPEWS? Jim Mercer (Jun 21)
- Re: SPEWS? up (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Clayton Fiske (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Chrisy Luke (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? David Lesher (Jun 20)