nanog mailing list archives
Re: SPEWS?
From: "Regis M. Donovan" <regis () offhand org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:32:25 -0400
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 02:35:16PM -0400, Steven J. Sobol wrote:
*Spamming* or launching a DoS attack in response to spam is definitely abusive.
and black-holing "innocent bystander" networks not a denial of service? --regis
Current thread:
- Re: SPEWS?, (continued)
- Re: SPEWS? Nathan J. Mehl (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 19)
- Re: SPEWS? jlewis (Jun 19)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Clayton Fiske (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Peter Galbavy (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Andy Johnson (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Regis M. Donovan (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Dan Hollis (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? David Charlap (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Dan Hollis (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Randy Bush (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? David Charlap (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Dan Hollis (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? measl (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Clayton Fiske (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Greg A. Woods (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Regis M. Donovan (Jun 20)