nanog mailing list archives
Re: SPEWS?
From: Lionel <longword () newsguy com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 13:47:27 +1000
[emailed to Alex & the list] On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 23:14:28 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time), Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net> wrote:
Since my last posting, I've told SpamAssassin (which, btw, is a rocking piece of ware) to count osirussoft (sp?) as a 0 point rule. They are so unilateral in the way they do this, and, often times don't even provide a _chance_ for the ISP to rectify the situation. It's crazy.
I know I'm going to regret commenting, but hopefully it'll help. How long had you been getting complaints about your user before you were SPEWS listed? -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- SPEWS? Alex Rubenstein (Jun 19)
- RE: SPEWS? Mark Radabaugh (Jun 19)
- RE: SPEWS? Alex Rubenstein (Jun 19)
- Re: SPEWS? Lionel (Jun 19)
- Re: SPEWS? Marc MERLIN (Jun 19)
- Re: SPEWS? Jason Slagle (Jun 19)
- RE: SPEWS? Alex Rubenstein (Jun 19)
- RE: SPEWS? Mark Radabaugh (Jun 19)
- Re: SPEWS? jlewis (Jun 19)
- Re: SPEWS? william (Jun 19)
- Re[2]: SPEWS? Richard Welty (Jun 19)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? william (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? up (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Nathan J. Mehl (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 19)