nanog mailing list archives

RE: SPEWS?


From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 23:14:28 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)



Quite.

Since my last posting, I've told SpamAssassin (which, btw, is a rocking
piece of ware) to count osirussoft (sp?) as a 0 point rule.

They are so unilateral in the way they do this, and, often times don't
even provide a _chance_ for the ISP to rectify the situation.

It's crazy.




On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Mark Radabaugh wrote:




So, to the point; what is the consensus on SPEWs? I've never really
noticed them until this point.


It's sort of an interesting concept but at least in my opinion it is
unusable as a blacklist.  Did you find the listing was causing a lot of
mail to bounce?

Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 833-3635


-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex () nac net, latency, Al Reuben --
--    Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net   --



Current thread: