nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"?
From: Stephen Griffin <stephen.griffin () rcn com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 12:57:07 -0400 (EDT)
In the referenced message, Richard Forno said:
I mean, garbage in, garbage out. Are they going to go door-to-door like censustakers to verify this info?
Are you saying that because the data won't be 100% correct, it is not worthwhile to try to make/keep it 98% correct? Or are you just commenting on using whois for criminal investigations?
Current thread:
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"?, (continued)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? amar (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? todd glassey (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Martin Hannigan (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Martin Hannigan (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Peter Galbavy (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? sjj (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Martin Hannigan (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Randy Bush (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Michael H. Warfield (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Martin Hannigan (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Stephen Griffin (Jun 19)