nanog mailing list archives
Re: istop arrogance
From: Paul Schultz <pschultz () pschultz com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 11:01:07 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
Because you could *gasp* be intelligent with your network design and do things like purchase transit from the same carriers in both your serving markets.I guess you don't consider redundancy to be intelligent. I do. I guess you can call me stupid.
Carriers is a plural word.. How does that not accomplish redundancy again? - Paul
Current thread:
- Re: solving problems instead of beating heads on walls [was: something about arrogance], (continued)
- Re: solving problems instead of beating heads on walls [was: something about arrogance] Brad Knowles (Jul 27)
- Re: solving problems instead of beating heads on walls [was: something about arrogance] C. Jon Larsen (Jul 27)
- Re: solving problems instead of beating heads on walls Paul Schultz (Jul 27)
- Re: solving problems instead of beating heads on walls Brad Knowles (Jul 27)
- Re: solving problems instead of beating heads on walls Andy Dills (Jul 27)
- Re: solving problems instead of beating heads on walls [was: something about arrogance] C. Jon Larsen (Jul 27)
- Re: verio arrogance Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 26)
- Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 27)
- Re: istop arrogance Paul Schultz (Jul 27)
- Re: istop arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 27)
- Re: istop arrogance Paul Schultz (Jul 27)
- Re: istop arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 27)
- Re: istop arrogance Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 27)
- Re: istop arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 27)
- Re: verio arrogance up (Jul 18)
- Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 18)
- RE: verio arrogance Daniel Golding (Jul 18)
- Re: verio arrogance Peter E. Fry (Jul 18)
- Re: verio arrogance Kai Schlichting (Jul 18)
- RE: verio arrogance Phil Rosenthal (Jul 18)