nanog mailing list archives
Re: verio arrogance
From: <up () 3 am>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 16:18:09 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
And your suggestion has technical deficiencies as well. I have a leased line between Toronto and Ottawa, so I want to announce my Ottawa IPs to my Toronto transit provider as well as an Ottawa transit provider. And the reverse for the Toronto IPs. My understand is trying to punch holes in PA space is much more difficult than de-aggregating ARIN PI space.
I can't really see why, as long as the provider has punched the appropriate hole for your aggregate in their filters. More specific routes always win out. Or am I missing your point? James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor up () 3 am http://3.am =========================================================================
Current thread:
- Re: solving problems instead of beating heads on walls [was: something about arrogance], (continued)
- Re: solving problems instead of beating heads on walls [was: something about arrogance] C. Jon Larsen (Jul 27)
- Re: verio arrogance Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 26)
- Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 27)
- Re: istop arrogance Paul Schultz (Jul 27)
- Re: istop arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 27)
- Re: istop arrogance Paul Schultz (Jul 27)
- Re: istop arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 27)
- Re: istop arrogance Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 27)
- Re: istop arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 27)
- Re: verio arrogance up (Jul 18)
- Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 18)
- RE: verio arrogance Daniel Golding (Jul 18)
- Re: verio arrogance Peter E. Fry (Jul 18)
- Re: verio arrogance Kai Schlichting (Jul 18)
- RE: verio arrogance Phil Rosenthal (Jul 18)