nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint peering policy
From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 01:15:27 -0400
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:03:45PM -0500, Andrew Odlyzko wrote:
Several estimates floating around (*) suggest between 60 and 100 PB (petabytes) per month of US backbone traffic, which works out to 180 and 300 Gb/s average traffic.
Oh I should also point out that I was guessing as to traffic exchanged between networks through peering not total transit traffic to "the internet", so 701 cust to 701 cust doesn't count. Incase anyone was confused about that. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
Current thread:
- Re: Sprint peering policy, (continued)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Randy Bush (Jul 01)
- Message not available
- Re: Sprint peering policy Randy Bush (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Martin Hannigan (Jul 01)
- True cost of peering (was Re: Sprint peering policy) Ralph Doncaster (Jul 01)
- Re: True cost of peering (was Re: Sprint peering policy) Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 01)
- Re: True cost of peering (was Re: Sprint peering policy) Ralph Doncaster (Jul 02)
- Re: True cost of peering (was Re: Sprint peering policy) alex (Jul 02)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Gordon Cook (Jul 02)