nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint peering policy
From: Andrew Odlyzko <odlyzko () dtc umn edu>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 23:03:45 -0500
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 21:07:06 -0400, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > It's all so much posturing, just like the people who claim they need OC768 > now or any time in the near future, or the people who sell 1Mbps customers > on the fact that their OC192 links are important. > If there is more than ~150Gbps of traffic total (counting the traffic only > once through the system) going through the US backbones I'd be very > surprised. Several estimates floating around (*) suggest between 60 and 100 PB (petabytes) per month of US backbone traffic, which works out to 180 and 300 Gb/s average traffic. Andrew Odlyzko (*) See my papers at <http://www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/networks.html>, or a recent (and about to be updated) report from RHK.
Current thread:
- Re: Sprint peering policy, (continued)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Robert A. Hayden (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Randy Bush (Jul 01)
- Message not available
- Re: Sprint peering policy Randy Bush (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Martin Hannigan (Jul 01)
- Re: True cost of peering (was Re: Sprint peering policy) Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 01)
- Re: True cost of peering (was Re: Sprint peering policy) Ralph Doncaster (Jul 02)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Gordon Cook (Jul 02)