nanog mailing list archives
Re: Readiness for IPV6
From: fingers <fingers () fingers co za>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 17:32:02 +0200 (SAST)
Hi quick question. how much actual traffic are operators seing from ipv6-enabled networks? whether native or 6to4. i.e. if you take the average amount of data sent/received per node, whether per protocol or per OS, how much of it is able to use V6 currently? i still find some of the stuff extremely user-unfriendly (winxp) for manual native configuation, and i'm sure other users do too. also, the amount of support for it is still sketchy (whether in the transport or from the applications themselves). Regards --Rob
Current thread:
- multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6), (continued)
- multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Jared Mauch (Jul 09)
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Leo Bicknell (Jul 09)
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Chris Parker (Jul 09)
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Leo Bicknell (Jul 09)
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) John Kristoff (Jul 09)
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Chris Parker (Jul 09)
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) David Charlap (Jul 09)
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Pete Kruckenberg (Jul 11)
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Jared Mauch (Jul 09)
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Niels Bakker (Jul 09)
- Re: Readiness for IPV6 fingers (Jul 09)
- Re: Readiness for IPV6 Matthew S. Hallacy (Jul 09)
- Re: Readiness for IPV6 Christian Nielsen (Jul 09)
- Re: Readiness for IPV6 Matthew S. Hallacy (Jul 09)
- RE: Readiness for IPV6 Jeroen Massar (Jul 09)
- [OT] Re: Readiness for IPV6 Matthew S. Hallacy (Jul 09)
- RE: [OT] Re: Readiness for IPV6 Vivien M. (Jul 09)
- Re: [OT] Re: Readiness for IPV6 Mathew Lodge (Jul 09)
- Re: [OT] Re: Readiness for IPV6 Stephen Sprunk (Jul 09)
- RE: [OT] Re: Readiness for IPV6 Jeroen Massar (Jul 09)
- RE: [OT] Re: Readiness for IPV6 Phil Rosenthal (Jul 09)