nanog mailing list archives
Re: redundancy [was: something about arrogance]
From: Patrick Evans <pre () PRE ORG>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:00:33 +0100 (BST)
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, David Schwartz wrote:
One more just for kicks. Client had a 100Mbps circuit from their sole provider (100Mbps to colocated router, DS3 from this router to their premises). The circuit had been in place for several years and the contract had long since expired. One day, they got a call
Er, what does due diligence mean to you? (We're waaaay into no-shit-sherlock territory here) (For the record, I'd consider any operation without an AS number a startup, and my first project, if network availability were a key issue, within any organisation would be to a) obtain one and b) make use of it. YMMV, but some V are more equal then others. Particularly in the current economic climate.) -- Patrick Evans, allegedly Email: pre () pre org CV: www.pre.org/pre/cv Wheels: Kawasaki ZXR400L9
Current thread:
- redundancy [was: something about arrogance] Pedro R Marques (Jul 30)
- Re: redundancy [was: something about arrogance] David Schwartz (Jul 30)
- RE: redundancy [was: something about arrogance] John Ferriby (Jul 30)
- Re: redundancy [was: something about arrogance] Patrick Evans (Jul 30)
- Re: redundancy [was: something about arrogance] Jim Shankland (Jul 30)
- Re: redundancy [was: something about arrogance] Patrick Evans (Jul 30)
- Re: redundancy [was: something about arrogance] David Schwartz (Jul 30)
- RE: redundancy [was: something about arrogance] Phil Rosenthal (Jul 30)
- RE: redundancy [was: something about arrogance] Derek Samford (Jul 30)
- RE: redundancy [was: something about arrogance] Manolo Hernandez (Jul 30)
- RE: redundancy [was: something about arrogance] Derek Samford (Jul 30)
- RE: redundancy [was: something about arrogance] Brad Knowles (Jul 30)
- RE: redundancy [was: something about arrogance] Derek Samford (Jul 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: redundancy [was: something about arrogance] Pedro R Marques (Jul 30)