nanog mailing list archives
Re: Blocking Internet Gaming
From: <achen-nanog () micropixel com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 20:23:35 -0800 (PST)
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Scott Francis wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 09:54:13PM -0500, james () james-web net said: [snip]But if a brand new packet is outbound to 29760, you know it is probably going to a Half Life server (I think that's the port). So wouldn't it be wise to deny that? Specifically it would be UDP 29760, not TCP.TCP 27015/27016 by default
For Half-life, it's 27015/UDP, not TCP. Cheers. -a
Current thread:
- RE: Blocking Internet Gaming, (continued)
- RE: Blocking Internet Gaming James (Jan 06)
- RE: Blocking Internet Gaming Todd Suiter (Jan 06)
- RE: Blocking Internet Gaming James (Jan 06)
- Re: Blocking Internet Gaming Jason Legate (Jan 09)
- RE: Blocking Internet Gaming Dominic J. Eidson (Jan 06)
- RE: Blocking Internet Gaming Dominic J. Eidson (Jan 06)
- RE: Blocking Internet Gaming Andy Walden (Jan 06)
- Re: Blocking Internet Gaming Scott Gifford (Jan 06)
- RE: Blocking Internet Gaming James (Jan 06)
- Re: Blocking Internet Gaming Scott Francis (Jan 06)
- Re: Blocking Internet Gaming achen-nanog (Jan 06)
- Re: Blocking Internet Gaming Brian Wallingford (Jan 06)
- Re: Blocking Internet Gaming Neil J. McRae (Jan 07)
- Re: Blocking Internet Gaming Dan Schmiedt (Jan 07)
- Re: Blocking Internet Gaming sthaug (Jan 07)
- Re: Blocking Internet Gaming Joe Abley (Jan 07)
- FWIW, Verisign buys .tv registry rights Richard Forno (Jan 07)
- Re: Blocking Internet Gaming Nathan J. Mehl (Jan 07)