nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () exigengroup com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 17:49:02 -0800 (PST)
You can always have as many domains as you wish -- inside your zone. Short words is a scarce resource, and therefore their use must be rationed in some way. The pure market approach (i.e. selling them for flat rate) doesn't seem to be sufficient for squatter deterrence (they nearly always lose in court, but this may be prohibitively expensive for those who have legitimate reasons for obtaining those domain names). --vadim On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote:
What right does the government have in preventing people from having multiple domains and trading/selling them? Thats none of your (or) the government's business. ----- Original Message ----- From: <vince () penguin-power com> To: "Vadim Antonov" <avg () exigengroup com> Cc: <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 7:22 AM Subject: Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management4) exponential fee increments for registering domains with the same payer's physical address and/or name.Yeah so I don't like this suggestion at all. What if a company has severalbusiness units each with its own domain name, with the same address, and with a shared accounting department. Or an ISP that offers to pay for its customers domain if they prepay for a year. Or someone like me who owns several domains?Nope I really dont' like this suggestion, the other ones seem to be morethought out.-Vince
Current thread:
- ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Patrick (Feb 25)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Vadim Antonov (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management vince (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Vadim Antonov (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Feb 26)
- Message not available
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management vince (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Vadim Antonov (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Vadim Antonov (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Simon Higgs (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management David Conrad (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Simon Higgs (Feb 27)