nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management
From: vince () penguin-power com
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 09:22:19 -0400
4) exponential fee increments for registering domains with the same payer's physical address and/or name.
Yeah so I don't like this suggestion at all. What if a company has several business units each with its own domain name, with the same address, and with a shared accounting department. Or an ISP that offers to pay for its customers domain if they prepay for a year. Or someone like me who owns several domains? Nope I really dont' like this suggestion, the other ones seem to be more thought out. -Vince
Current thread:
- ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Patrick (Feb 25)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Vadim Antonov (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management vince (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Vadim Antonov (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Feb 26)
- Message not available
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management vince (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Vadim Antonov (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Vadim Antonov (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Simon Higgs (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management David Conrad (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Simon Higgs (Feb 27)