![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: it's here
From: Ron da Silva <ron () aol net>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:03:42 -0500
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 04:06:23PM +0000, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
Long term all users of internet routing hardware (or routing hardware in general) should push their vendors to implement line-rate filtering. There really is no reason NOT to do it is there? Even better would be the ability to look inside the entire packet, this way the next code-red can be stopped at a higher level in the network where people that actually care about the problem can take appropriate action.
BOTH linerate filtering and packet inspection should be part of the minimal requirements to sell routing hardware. Hmm...so in case any vendor out there hasn't heard this directly from us, consider this a clarification of our requirements. And UUnet's...and ?? any other providers want to make sure that the vendor community gets the message here? -ron
Current thread:
- Re: it's here, (continued)
- Re: it's here Jared Mauch (Feb 13)
- Re: it's here Jesper Skriver (Feb 13)
- Re: it's here Eric Brandwine (Feb 13)
- Re: it's here kevin graham (Feb 13)
- Re: it's here Jesper Skriver (Feb 13)
- Re: it's here Jake Khuon (Feb 13)
- Re: it's here Steve Noble (Feb 13)
- RE: it's here Tony Hain (Feb 13)
- Re: it's here Eric Brandwine (Feb 13)
- Re: it's here Christopher L. Morrow (Feb 13)
- Re: it's here Ron da Silva (Feb 13)
- Re: it's here Stephen Sprunk (Feb 14)
- RE: it's here Deepak Jain (Feb 14)