Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks?

[Nigel Titley <nigel () packetexchange net>]

On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 17:03, Bryan Bradsby wrote:
> > Check out www.antispews.org
> > -kyle
>
> There are two SPEWS lists.
>
> SPEWS[1] lists direct spam sources as accurately as /32

Which is the list that our corporate servers and my home lan ended up
on, despite never having sent direct spam

> SPEWS[2] includes SPEWS[1] plus collatteral damage.

Which was the rest of our address range and that of my home ISP
 
> to clarify, nothing more.

The intent of the double spews listing is good, but it isn't adhered to
in practice.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part