nanog mailing list archives
Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () att net il>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 17:29:30 +0200
At 13:09 11/09/01 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
The people responsible were *NOT* sick. They were *very* logical, well-prepared, methodical, and rational. The problem is that
Exceedingly logical: the reason a clear blue-sky day was picked was twofold: easier to navigate with clearsite rather than in clouds and rain and more importantly, they wanted the world to see the clear picture of what they did, which would not be so clear in a rainy and overcast day.
-Hank
Current thread:
- Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect, (continued)
- Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 11)
- Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect Andy Walden (Sep 11)
- Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect Terence (Sep 11)
- RE: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect Wayne Gustavus (Sep 11)
- Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect Ariel Biener (Sep 11)
- Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect Howard C. Berkowitz (Sep 11)
- Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect Vincent J. Bono (Sep 11)
- Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect Terence (Sep 11)
- Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect Dave Morton (Sep 11)
- Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 11)
- Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect Hank Nussbacher (Sep 12)
- Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect E.B. Dreger (Sep 11)
- Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect Thomas P. Brisco (Sep 11)
- Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect Joe Shaw (Sep 11)