nanog mailing list archives
Re: Re[3]: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:28:10 -0400
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:46:48 BST, Alex Bligh said:
Oh so true, and of far wider applicability than the subject at hand. If this mailing list had a FAQ, this should be the answer to most of the questions.
Q1: What are the common flame wars on NANOG? A1: RFC1918, ORBS/MAPS, ARIN, PI /28s, DSL for business use. Q2: What are some proper ways to configure/run a network? For instance, should I use RFC1910 space to number my routers? A2: See Q1. -- Valdis Kletnieks Operating Systems Analyst Virginia Tech
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ..., (continued)
- RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Daniel Senie (Sep 09)
- RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Roeland Meyer (Sep 10)
- RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Andy Dills (Sep 10)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... bmanning (Sep 10)
- RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Andy Dills (Sep 10)
- RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Roeland Meyer (Sep 10)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Scott Gifford (Sep 10)
- Re[2]: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Richard Welty (Sep 10)
- Re[2]: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... RJ Atkinson (Sep 10)
- Re[3]: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Richard Welty (Sep 10)
- Re: Re[3]: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Alex Bligh (Sep 10)
- Re: Re[3]: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 10)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Scott Gifford (Sep 10)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Eric A. Hall (Sep 10)
- RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Greg Maxwell (Sep 10)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Scott Gifford (Sep 10)