nanog mailing list archives
Re: Re[3]: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...
From: Alex Bligh <alex () alex org uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:46:48 +0100
right this minute, reality sucks, and cannot be instantly fixed by a stupid flame war.
Oh so true, and of far wider applicability than the subject at hand. If this mailing list had a FAQ, this should be the answer to most of the questions. Alex Bligh Personal Capacity
Current thread:
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ..., (continued)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 09)
- RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Daniel Senie (Sep 09)
- RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Roeland Meyer (Sep 10)
- RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Andy Dills (Sep 10)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... bmanning (Sep 10)
- RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Andy Dills (Sep 10)
- RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Roeland Meyer (Sep 10)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Scott Gifford (Sep 10)
- Re[2]: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Richard Welty (Sep 10)
- Re[2]: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... RJ Atkinson (Sep 10)
- Re[3]: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Richard Welty (Sep 10)
- Re: Re[3]: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Alex Bligh (Sep 10)
- Re: Re[3]: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 10)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Scott Gifford (Sep 10)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Eric A. Hall (Sep 10)
- RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Greg Maxwell (Sep 10)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Scott Gifford (Sep 10)