nanog mailing list archives
Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...
From: Bob K <melange () yip org>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 17:38:30 -0400 (EDT)
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Jared Mauch wrote:
I think you are obviously missing the point that people use nat to prevent inbound connections as part of their security measures.
Every firewall I've ever seen allows you to do the exact same thing without NAT. -- Bob <melange () yip org> | Yes. I know. That is, indeed, *not* mayonnaise.
Current thread:
- Re: end2end? (was: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...), (continued)
- Re: end2end? (was: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...) bmanning (Sep 07)
- Re: end2end? (was: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...) steve uurtamo (Sep 07)
- Re: end2end? (was: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...) Leo Bicknell (Sep 07)
- RE: end2end? (was: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...) Mike Batchelor (Sep 07)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Bob K (Sep 06)
- RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Roeland Meyer (Sep 06)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Adam McKenna (Sep 07)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Circusnuts (Sep 09)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Alex Bligh (Sep 09)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Jared Mauch (Sep 09)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Bob K (Sep 09)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Jared Mauch (Sep 09)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Daniel Senie (Sep 09)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Brian Whalen (Sep 09)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Randy Bush (Sep 09)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Scott Gifford (Sep 10)
- Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Adam McKenna (Sep 07)