Re: end2end? (was: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...)

[steve uurtamo <uurtamo () arttoday com>]

>       And can I persuade the judge that since NATs are known to
>       muck about w/ addresses & such that I can construct a case
>       that what was received did not come from me. So the porn
>       came from one of the NAT operators.

similarly, the anonymous remail operator sends all outbound mail, eh?
i dunno.

s.