nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al.
From: "Peter Galbavy" <peter.galbavy () knowtion net>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 20:59:06 +0100
Zebra: OSPF is twitchy, BGP is either great or takes > 1 hour to converge a full table, with no clear reason why, and it does not support anything but Linux/Intel sanely, yet.
No real problems on OpenBSD/i386. Very nice with Tyan Thunder KT7 based boards. Looking forward to the current round of peer-group code going in. You want commercially supported BGP, but Cisco/Juniper/whatever. You want free - use the source, Luke. Peter
Current thread:
- BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Joel Baker (Sep 28)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Dan Hollis (Sep 28)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Joel Baker (Sep 28)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. matthew zeier (Sep 28)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Jason Legate (Sep 28)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Peter Galbavy (Sep 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Stephane Bortzmeyer (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Stephane Bortzmeyer (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Dan Hollis (Sep 28)