nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al.
From: Joel Baker <lucifer () lightbearer com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:36:46 -0600
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 02:31:29PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Joel Baker wrote:Zebra: OSPF is twitchy, BGP is either great or takes > 1 hour to converge a full table, with no clear reason why, and it does not support anything but Linux/Intel sanely, yet.Maybe im just lucky but the only problems ive had with zebra so far is with equal cost multipath. Everything else works great.
On Linux/Intel, it works fairly well. On Solaris/Sparc, it does well to compile. At all. Much less run. Much less run stably. -- *************************************************************************** Joel Baker System Administrator - lightbearer.com lucifer () lightbearer com http://users.lightbearer.com/lucifer/
Current thread:
- BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Joel Baker (Sep 28)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Dan Hollis (Sep 28)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Joel Baker (Sep 28)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. matthew zeier (Sep 28)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Jason Legate (Sep 28)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Peter Galbavy (Sep 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Stephane Bortzmeyer (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Stephane Bortzmeyer (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Dan Hollis (Sep 28)