nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verio Peering Question
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 16:31:34 -0700
I don't think anyone has ever claimed (Randy included) that filtering out long prefixes never hurts performance /to those long prefixes/. Just that the usage of those long prefixes is small, the effect is often small, and the NET effect (i.e. on performance to all prefixes) is often improved, AND the 'public good' effect, in terms of encouraging CIDR and discouraging disaggregation has benefits for the global routing table, for everybody, in terms of reduction of cost (nice statistical demonstration at last IETF Ptomaine session - please refer to 'belling the cat' problem). Are you going to present statistical data to the contrary?
<http://psg.com/~rand/010809.ptomaine.pdf> randy
Current thread:
- Verio Peering Question P R (Sep 27)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 27)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Alex Bligh (Sep 27)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Randy Bush (Sep 27)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 27)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Randy Bush (Sep 27)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Lucy E. Lynch (Sep 27)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Rob Thomas (Sep 27)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Alex Bligh (Sep 27)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 27)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Dorian Kim (Sep 27)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 28)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Majdi S. Abbas (Sep 28)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Sean Donelan (Sep 28)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Alex Bligh (Sep 28)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 27)