nanog mailing list archives

Re: Changed Cisco Memory Policy??


From: Rodney Dunn <rodunn () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 09:06:20 -0400


Bradly,

Can you forward me a copy of that email and
I'll verify it for everyone?

Thanks,
rodney

On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 07:27:45AM -0400, Paul Timmins wrote:


Less than a week ago Cisco TAC recommended DRAM from the Approved Vendor 
List to me. I hope this is not true.
-Paul

At 06:16 AM 10/12/2001 -0500, you wrote:


Has anybody else received one of
these emails?  I don't have an issue
related to this, but I am concerned that
this will drive up the costs of maintaining
and improving my infrastructure.

-bradly

Going forward, Cisco no longer recommends
the use in our networking products of memory
products sold by third parties.  Cisco has therefore
discontinued the "Approved Vendor List" we have
maintained in the past.  In the event your company
contacts Cisco with a support issue, and Cisco
determines that the support issue you have reported
is one that arises from your company's use of a third
party memory product, Cisco may, in its discretion,
refuse to provide technical assistance to help
resolve the issue you have identified, whether
such assistance would be provided under a product
warranty or under a support plan such as SmartNet.


Current thread: