![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Changed Cisco Memory Policy??
From: "Walters" <bwalters () inet-direct com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 06:16:22 -0500
Has anybody else received one of these emails? I don't have an issue related to this, but I am concerned that this will drive up the costs of maintaining and improving my infrastructure. -bradly
Going forward, Cisco no longer recommends the use in our networking products of memory products sold by third parties. Cisco has therefore discontinued the "Approved Vendor List" we have maintained in the past. In the event your company contacts Cisco with a support issue, and Cisco determines that the support issue you have reported is one that arises from your company's use of a third party memory product, Cisco may, in its discretion, refuse to provide technical assistance to help resolve the issue you have identified, whether such assistance would be provided under a product warranty or under a support plan such as SmartNet.
Current thread:
- Filtering Best Practices, et al (Was Verio Peering, Gordon's Knot) Grant A. Kirkwood (Oct 09)
- Re: Filtering Best Practices, et al (Was Verio Peering, Gordon's Knot) Jared Mauch (Oct 09)
- Re: Filtering Best Practices, et al (Was Verio Peering, Gordon's Knot) E.B. Dreger (Oct 09)
- Re: Filtering Best Practices, et al (Was Verio Peering, Gordon's Rob Thomas (Oct 09)
- Changed Cisco Memory Policy?? Walters (Oct 12)
- Re: Changed Cisco Memory Policy?? Paul Timmins (Oct 12)
- Re: Changed Cisco Memory Policy?? Rodney Dunn (Oct 12)
- Re: Filtering Best Practices, et al (Was Verio Peering, Gordon's Rob Thomas (Oct 09)
- Re: Filtering Best Practices, et al (Was Verio Peering, Gordon's Knot) Andreas Plesner Jacobsen (Oct 10)