nanog mailing list archives
Re: 214/8 and 215/8
From: Joe Abley <jabley () automagic org>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 10:29:15 -0500
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 12:13:08PM +0000, Nigel Titley wrote:
bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:214/8 and 215/8 seem to have been allocated to the U.S. DoD in ca. 1998. There does seem to be a few sizeable announcements (which overlap a few not-so-sizable ones), but I have to wonder if anyone can explain the grounds on which they were allocated these two /8s, and which body did the allocation. Anyone? Sean.I could. Why does it matter?Oh, openness, transparency, that sort of thing. Nothing really important.
The full RFC2050 justification for a /7's worth of space would be a mighty and wondrous thing to behold. Joe
Current thread:
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 bmanning (Oct 31)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Nigel Titley (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Joe Abley (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Christopher A. Woodfield (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 John Kristoff (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Eliot Lear (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Simon Lyall (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 bmanning (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Joe Abley (Nov 01)
- RE: 214/8 and 215/8 Daniel Golding (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Nigel Titley (Nov 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Joe Provo (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Sean M. Doran (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Sean M. Doran (Nov 01)