nanog mailing list archives
Re: MPLS in metro access networks
From: Dave Siegel <dave () siegelie com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:34:37 -0700
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 08:17:30PM -0500, Leo Bicknell reportedly typed:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 05:27:15PM -0700, Dave Siegel wrote:That being said, I would love to see some quantifiable data showing the differences in switching latencies between labels and packets. %age increaseIf there is a difference in latency between MPLS and IP switching you need to beat your vendor, and/or change vendors.
If there is a difference, I would expect it to be in the order of low, single-digit microseconds. -- Dave Siegel HOME 520-877-2593 dave at siegelie dot com WORK 520-877-2628 dsiegel at gblx dot net Director, IP Engineering, Global Crossing
Current thread:
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks, (continued)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Quibell, Marc (Nov 15)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Quibell, Marc (Nov 15)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Michael Cohen (Nov 15)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Quibell, Marc (Nov 15)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Michael Cohen (Nov 15)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Gary Blankenship (Nov 16)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Gary Blankenship (Nov 18)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Michael Cohen (Nov 15)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Daniel Golding (Nov 16)
- Re: MPLS in metro access networks Dave Siegel (Nov 28)
- Re: MPLS in metro access networks Leo Bicknell (Nov 28)
- Re: MPLS in metro access networks Dave Siegel (Nov 30)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Daniel Golding (Nov 29)
- Re: MPLS in metro access networks Eric Osborne (Nov 30)
- Re: MPLS in metro access networks srihari varada (Nov 15)
- Re: MPLS in metro access networks Eric Osborne (Nov 15)
- Re: MPLS in metro access networks Stephen Stuart (Nov 15)