nanog mailing list archives
Re: MPLS in metro access networks
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:17:30 -0500
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 05:27:15PM -0700, Dave Siegel wrote:
That being said, I would love to see some quantifiable data showing the differences in switching latencies between labels and packets. %age increase
If there is a difference in latency between MPLS and IP switching you need to beat your vendor, and/or change vendors. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request () tmbg org, www.tmbg.org
Current thread:
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks, (continued)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Daniel Golding (Nov 16)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Quibell, Marc (Nov 15)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Quibell, Marc (Nov 15)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Michael Cohen (Nov 15)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Quibell, Marc (Nov 15)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Michael Cohen (Nov 15)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Gary Blankenship (Nov 16)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Gary Blankenship (Nov 18)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Michael Cohen (Nov 15)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Daniel Golding (Nov 16)
- Re: MPLS in metro access networks Dave Siegel (Nov 28)
- Re: MPLS in metro access networks Leo Bicknell (Nov 28)
- Re: MPLS in metro access networks Dave Siegel (Nov 30)
- RE: MPLS in metro access networks Daniel Golding (Nov 29)
- Re: MPLS in metro access networks Eric Osborne (Nov 30)
- Re: MPLS in metro access networks srihari varada (Nov 15)
- Re: MPLS in metro access networks Eric Osborne (Nov 15)
- Re: MPLS in metro access networks Stephen Stuart (Nov 15)