nanog mailing list archives
Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches)
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 01:09:54 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Steve Gibbard wrote:
24 seems way too young to be an old timer, but I keep reading these DNS arguments and wondering if everybody else has forgotten that we've already seen something very similar to multiple roots, and that the market has already taken care of it. While I could possibly be proven wrong if
I found an archive of NAMEDROPPERS going back to 1983. If you are interested in the subject, or just want to know how we got here, its an interesting read. Anonymous FTP at ftp://ops.ietf.org/lists/ in 1983, 1984, etc. If you don't know the past, you are doomed to repeat it. Even though I disagree with some of them, I understand some of the decisions a bit better.
Current thread:
- RE: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches, (continued)
- RE: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Mathias Koerber (Nov 18)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Paul Vixie (Nov 18)
- how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) E.B. Dreger (Nov 18)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) measl (Nov 19)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Adrian Chadd (Nov 19)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 19)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Adrian Chadd (Nov 19)
- Message not available
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Simon Higgs (Nov 19)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have... bmanning (Nov 19)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Steve Gibbard (Nov 21)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Sean Donelan (Nov 21)
- RE: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) W.D.McKinney (Nov 22)
- RE: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Randy Bush (Nov 22)
- Message not available
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Simon Higgs (Nov 27)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Simon Higgs (Nov 27)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 19)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Simon Higgs (Nov 19)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Joel Baker (Nov 18)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Randy Bush (Nov 18)