nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN off the map
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 21:41:35 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Sean Donelan wrote:I know of no critical Internet infrastructure service which requires www.icann.org to be reachable in order to function.I don't believe I ever said it did. If you think that I get some sort of pleasure out of them being down, I don't.
As far as I can tell, DNS for icann.org is functioning as designed. It has several name servers dispersed across geographical areas and network topology which continue to give authoritative answers for the icann.org zone without interruption. Isn't that how its supposed to work? ICANN has nothing to do with routing, the world wide web, or lots of other things on the Internet.
Current thread:
- ICANN off the map Patrick Greenwell (Nov 18)
- Re: ICANN off the map Sean Donelan (Nov 18)
- Re: ICANN off the map Patrick Greenwell (Nov 18)
- Re: ICANN off the map Sean Donelan (Nov 18)
- Re: ICANN off the map Patrick Greenwell (Nov 18)
- Re: ICANN off the map Stephane Bortzmeyer (Nov 19)
- Re: ICANN off the map measl (Nov 19)
- Re: ICANN off the map Majdi S. Abbas (Nov 19)
- Re: ICANN off the map Patrick Greenwell (Nov 19)
- Re: ICANN off the map Patrick Greenwell (Nov 18)
- Re: ICANN off the map Dave Crocker (Nov 19)
- Re: ICANN off the map Patrick Greenwell (Nov 19)
- Re: ICANN off the map Dave Crocker (Nov 19)
- Re: ICANN off the map Sean Donelan (Nov 18)
- Re: ICANN off the map Joe Provo (Nov 19)
- Re: ICANN off the map Patrick Greenwell (Nov 19)