nanog mailing list archives
Re: Stealth Blocking
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 12:25:40 -0400
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 06:39:53PM -0400, Mitch Halmu wrote:
methods by which you implement them. You are still treating our company like some rogue .cn domain. One shoe fits all.
You've chosen to be part of the problem, Mitch, not part of the solution. The fact that you're only a small part of the problem doesn't make it less sensible to filter you.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Stealth Blocking, (continued)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Valdis . Kletnieks (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Paul Vixie (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking John Payne (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Mitch Halmu (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking John Payne (May 23)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Scott Raymond (May 25)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Mitch Halmu (May 25)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Andy (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking J.D. Falk (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Mitch Halmu (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Shawn McMahon (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Scott Francis (May 23)
- RE: Stealth Blocking David Schwartz (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Robert Sharp (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Valdis . Kletnieks (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Robert Sharp (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Valdis . Kletnieks (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Robert Sharp (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Margie Arbon (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Aaron L. Meehan (May 23)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Vivien M. (May 23)