nanog mailing list archives
RE: Stability of the Internet?
From: Albert Meyer <albert () waller net>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 20:13:20 -0500
I hear this same argument from clients who want me to unblock Napster. If you look at the definition of censorship, it becomes fairly clear that when a private company decides to block certain types of content from its private network, that is not censorship. In order to "censor" Napster, or new.net, or anything else, I would have to block (or at least attempt to block) every possible access to it, rather than simply blocking it from my company's private network.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=censor At 04:22 PM 5/18/01 -0700, Mike Batchelor wrote:
Blocking new.net is, in fact, censorship, not a cost saving measure.
Current thread:
- Re: Stability of the Internet?, (continued)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Steve Schaefer (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Eric A. Hall (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Bruce Campbell (May 20)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 21)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Simon Lyall (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? mike harrison (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? William Allen Simpson (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Kevin Loch (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Tim Langdell, PhD (May 18)
- RE: Stability of the Internet? Mike Batchelor (May 18)
- RE: Stability of the Internet? Albert Meyer (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Ariel Biener (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Shawn McMahon (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Stephen J. Wilcox (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Tim Langdell, PhD (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Shawn McMahon (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Patrick Greenwell (May 19)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Scott Francis (May 18)