nanog mailing list archives
Re: Stability of the Internet?
From: Kevin Loch <kloch () opnsys com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 14:22:00 -0400
Does that include blocking nameservers that respond authoritatively for those TLD's? Oh wait, that probably doesn't matter since I saw a certain company featured on FC yesterday... William Allen Simpson wrote:
Anyway, the fact that some of us now block BGP acceptance for the new.net blocks, because it causes us support costs, would be an argument that the Internet is less "stable".
Current thread:
- Re: Stability of the Internet?, (continued)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? ken harris. (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Tim Langdell, PhD (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Subhendu Ghosh (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Steve Schaefer (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Eric A. Hall (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Bruce Campbell (May 20)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 21)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Simon Lyall (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? mike harrison (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? William Allen Simpson (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Kevin Loch (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Tim Langdell, PhD (May 18)
- RE: Stability of the Internet? Mike Batchelor (May 18)
- RE: Stability of the Internet? Albert Meyer (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Ariel Biener (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Shawn McMahon (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Stephen J. Wilcox (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Tim Langdell, PhD (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Shawn McMahon (May 18)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Patrick Greenwell (May 19)
- Re: Stability of the Internet? Scott Francis (May 18)