nanog mailing list archives
Re: MBone access
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () kotovnik com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:44:17 -0800 (PST)
No amount of education can change the simple fact that the transport level multicasting is a broken concept. I do not want to reiterate all the years-old arguments, it suffices to say that since then no magic bullet was found allowing multicating to be safe to the routing infrastructure, or scalable enough for use by the mass of regular end-users. Some bad ideas just won't die. --vadim
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:40:06PM -0600, Tim Winders wrote:I'm curious what barriers are keeping multicast from being deployed at the edges. Does your upstream not support multicast connectivity, or is it an education issue in getting connected?In my case... lack of understand/education.
Current thread:
- Re: Mbone access, (continued)
- Re: Mbone access Marshall Eubanks (Mar 27)
- Re: MBone access Toerless Eckert (Mar 27)
- Re: MBone access Marshall Eubanks (Mar 27)
- Re: MBone access Hank Nussbacher (Mar 27)
- Re: MBone access Marshall Eubanks (Mar 27)
- Re: MBone access Jared Mauch (Mar 27)
- Re: MBone access Tim Winders (Mar 27)
- Re: MBone access Brent Sweeny (Mar 27)
- Re: MBone access Tim Winders (Mar 27)
- Re: MBone access Brent Sweeny (Mar 27)
- Re: MBone access Vadim Antonov (Mar 27)
- Re: MBone access Marshall Eubanks (Mar 27)
- Re: MBone access just me. (Mar 27)
- Re: MBone access Marshall Eubanks (Mar 27)
- Re: MBone access Steve Meuse (Mar 27)
- Re: MBone access Havard Eidnes (Mar 30)