nanog mailing list archives
Re: Statements against new.net?
From: Daniel Roesen <droesen () entire-systems com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 18:47:46 +0100
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 09:22:52AM -0800, Roeland Meyer wrote:
IIRC, there was an "issue" around the assignment of 16.1.16.1; (The coolness factor was the binary representation, of course.)Sorry, it was the hex representation, of course.HEX:=="313631313631"
16.1.16.1 = 0x10011001 regards, Daniel
Current thread:
- Re: Statements against new.net?, (continued)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Adrian Chadd (Mar 15)
- DNS Control mike harrison (Mar 15)
- Re: DNS Control Jim Dixon (Mar 15)
- Re: DNS Control mike harrison (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Adrian Chadd (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Vadim Antonov (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Joe Abley (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Daniel Roesen (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 15)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Simon Higgs (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Stephen Stuart (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Simon Higgs (Mar 15)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mathias Koerber (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Michael Shields (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Joe Abley (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Mar 15)