nanog mailing list archives
RE: Statements against new.net?
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:22:52 -0800
From: Stephen Stuart [mailto:stuart () mfnx net] Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 8:53 AMIIRC, there was an "issue" around the assignment of16.1.16.1; I don'tthink lawyers had been invented back then, so the scope ofthe scandalremained relatively small. (The coolness factor was the binary representation, of course.)Sorry, it was the hex representation, of course.
HEX:=="313631313631" Leet:="ELEBELELEBEL" Sorry, I just don't get it ... Is there another coding overlay?
Current thread:
- RE: Statements against new.net?, (continued)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Roeland Meyer (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Adrian Chadd (Mar 15)
- DNS Control mike harrison (Mar 15)
- Re: DNS Control Jim Dixon (Mar 15)
- Re: DNS Control mike harrison (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Adrian Chadd (Mar 15)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Roeland Meyer (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Vadim Antonov (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Joe Abley (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Daniel Roesen (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 15)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Simon Higgs (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Stephen Stuart (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Simon Higgs (Mar 15)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mathias Koerber (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Michael Shields (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Joe Abley (Mar 15)