nanog mailing list archives
RE: Statements against new.net?
From: "Mathias Koerber" <mathias () koerber org>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 20:21:19 +0800
[... Blackholing new.net...] If we all do that (And yes I can see a significant [10%+] fraction of this group's readership doing it), then the problem goes away soon. An elegant fix, except that new.net would probably sue anyone who blackholed them...Indeed they would. It is even likely that they'd win. Such action wouldn't win ICANN any favours in Congress either.
I am not an American and not really familiar with US laws and political thinking, but why is it that it is considered OKfor someone to break away from, ignore the DNS root system, but not for others to blackhole a player whose traffic they don't want to see. What laws would prohibit the latter while not affeting the former? Mathias
Current thread:
- RE: Statements against new.net?, (continued)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Roeland Meyer (Mar 13)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Roeland Meyer (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 13)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mathew Butler (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Roeland Meyer (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Roeland Meyer (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Roeland Meyer (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Roeland Meyer (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mathias Koerber (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? David Charlap (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mark Radabaugh - Amplex (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Edward S. Marshall (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Ron Snyder (Mar 15)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mathias Koerber (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Marshall Eubanks (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Mar 14)