nanog mailing list archives
Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
From: Jeff Mcadams <jeffm () iglou com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:49:41 -0400
Also sprach Derek Balling
At 11:23 AM -0700 6/25/01, Bruce Robertson wrote:So the upshot is that I won't sign a contract that forces me to do something impossible, and certainly against by business interests.
... so then your contract expires, and only SBC remains.
This hurts SBC precisely how, again?
It hurts them big time when the state Utilities Commission looks at the situation and starts asking why on earth all of these ISPs are suddenly exiting the DSL marketplace. It will particularly hurt them if one or more of the ISPs files a formal complaint with the Utility Commission. -- Jeff McAdams Email: jeffm () iglou com Head Network Administrator Voice: (502) 966-3848 IgLou Internet Services (800) 436-4456
Current thread:
- SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Bruce Robertson (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Bruce Robertson (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Derek Balling (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Derek Balling (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Bruce Robertson (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Jeff Mcadams (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Derek Balling (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Dee McKinney (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Derek Balling (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Steven J. Sobol (Jun 26)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Bruce Robertson (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Charles Sprickman (Jun 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Bruce Robertson (Jun 25)