nanog mailing list archives
Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
From: Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:35:59 -0500
Once upon a time, Christopher A. Woodfield <rekoil () semihuman com> said:
If I'm reading this correctly, SBC is forcing ISPs that resell SBC's DSL access to go with PPPoE over ATM, thus potentially forcing businesses to buy DSL net access from SBC directly.
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how PPPoA forces businesses to buy DSL elsewhere. -- Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Current thread:
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs, (continued)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Bruce Robertson (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Derek Balling (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Derek Balling (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Bruce Robertson (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Jeff Mcadams (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Derek Balling (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Dee McKinney (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Derek Balling (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Steven J. Sobol (Jun 26)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Charles Sprickman (Jun 25)