nanog mailing list archives
Re: C&W Peering Problem?
From: David Diaz <davediaz () iwcinc net>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 14:35:43 -0400
I was wondering when this issue was going to be brought up. C&W dropped peering with several backbones. I will bet the problems started about a week ago. It might beg an interesting question. If a tier1 drops enough other backbones that are non-transit buyers.... doesnt that mean that the tier1 is no longer tier1??? Seems that C&W no longer has full routes.
Considering that they have been shopping for a buyer of the company, I would guess to say this administrative more affects their share value... doesnt it.
dd At 2:25 PM -0400 6/1/01, Charles Scott wrote:
All: Just got off the phone with C&W's NOC trying to find out why NASA.GOV had fallen off the edge of the earth. When I asked if this had anything to do with the C&W peering policy, the answer was yes. Does anyone have any more information on this? Chuck
Current thread:
- C&W Peering Problem? Charles Scott (Jun 01)
- Re: C&W Peering Problem? Charles Scott (Jun 01)
- Re: C&W Peering Problem? David Diaz (Jun 01)
- Re: C&W Peering Problem? Simon Lockhart (Jun 01)
- RE: C&W Peering Problem? Jason Lewis (Jun 01)
- Re: C&W Peering Problem? Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 01)
- RE: C&W Peering Problem? Scott Patterson (Jun 01)
- Re: C&W Peering Problem? Christian Nielsen (Jun 05)
- Re: C&W Peering Problem? Simon Lockhart (Jun 01)
- Re: C&W Peering Problem? Bill Woodcock (Jun 01)
- Re: C&W Peering Problem? David Diaz (Jun 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: C&W Peering Problem? Karyn Ulriksen (Jun 01)
- RE: C&W Peering Problem? Sean Donelan (Jun 01)
- RE: C&W Peering Problem? Steve Schaefer (Jun 01)