nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNET peering policy
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () opaltelecom co uk>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 09:47:47 +0000 (GMT)
Hmm, what are they trying to prove? They want to own the Internet no doubt. I'd prefer to pay another like Genuity for transit to UUNET than pay them direct and feed their appetite for power. I imagine the policy has come from some executive meeting where they discuss ways to further capitalize on their existing market share.. Steve
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:32:18AM -0500, Barrows, Jeff wrote:UUNET has just posted their new peering policy: http://www.uu.net/peering/btw, here is something to compare it to: http://www.genuity.com/infrastructure/interconnection.htm -Basil
Current thread:
- UUNET peering policy Barrows, Jeff (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Jan-Ahrent Czmok (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Simon Lockhart (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Deepak Jain (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Basil Kruglov (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy John Fraizer (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policyy Majdi S. Abbas (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: UUNET peering policy Sean Donelan (Feb 24)
- OT - VPN help Stephen Burd (Feb 24)
- Re: OT - VPN help Brian W. (Feb 24)
- Re: OT - VPN help jlewis (Feb 24)
- Re: OT - VPN help jeremiah (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Rodney Joffe (Feb 24)
- OT - VPN help Stephen Burd (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Jeff . Hodges (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy smd (Feb 24)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Jan-Ahrent Czmok (Feb 24)