nanog mailing list archives
Re:
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 18:41:11 -0800
Maybe. However, l2 is for telco. l2 exchange ponints are a labor suck and are fragile. The right path is l1, though, then, there is less reason to have exchange points. It will be more obvious as the peering speed between two ISPs exceeds that of a single physical interface.
glad to have words of practical wisedom from your experience as a large provider. randy
Current thread:
- Re: Exchange point networks, (continued)
- Re: Exchange point networks Randy Bush (Feb 24)
- Re: Exchange point networks Howard C. Berkowitz (Feb 24)
- Re: Exchange point networks Jim Dixon (Feb 24)
- Re: Exchange point networks Neil J. McRae (Feb 24)
- Re: Exchange point networks hardie (Feb 24)
- RE: Exchange point networks Barry Raveendran Greene (Feb 24)
- Re: Exchange point networks bmanning (Feb 24)
- RE: Barry Raveendran Greene (Feb 24)
- Re: Randy Bush (Feb 24)
- Re: Dave Curado (Feb 24)
- Re: Masataka Ohta (Feb 24)
- Re: Vadim Antonov (Feb 24)