nanog mailing list archives
Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: 2 Feb 2001 14:50:53 -0800
On Fri, 02 February 2001, Pim van Riezen wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Eric A. Hall wrote:The real culprit in this story is the script-generator. It should have been cranking out standard-compliant zone files from day one.Absolutely. The guilty party for that script has long left the organization. This is real world, where people have to deal with other people's messes :).
Don't worry, someday people will say the same thing about the messes you leave behind.
Current thread:
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Sean Donelan (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Eric A. Hall (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Joshua Goodall (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Pim van Riezen (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Roeland Meyer (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] RE: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Pim van Riezen (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Sean Donelan (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Eric A. Hall (Feb 24)