nanog mailing list archives
Re: [NANOG] Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded
From: Pim van Riezen <pi () vuurwerk nl>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:05:49 +0100
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Eric A. Hall wrote:
The real culprit in this story is the script-generator. It should have been cranking out standard-compliant zone files from day one.
Absolutely. The guilty party for that script has long left the organization. This is real world, where people have to deal with other people's messes :). Pi
Current thread:
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Sean Donelan (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Eric A. Hall (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Joshua Goodall (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Pim van Riezen (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Roeland Meyer (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] RE: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Pim van Riezen (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Sean Donelan (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Eric A. Hall (Feb 24)